
Toronto – My fellow Panic Manualers are doing a great job covering the latest and greatest music of the day. So I’ve decided to explore some uncharted territories for the Panic Manual. Time will tell whether this thought experiment pans out. But it’s high time I start writing about some music that I’m passionate about: jazz.
Jazz first came into use as a term in the early 20th century from within its motherland, New Orleans. Some early newspapers from the era referred to this new music as “Jass”, before spelling consensus was reached. It was a simple idea really, and it comes down to one thing: collective improvisation. The concept is simple: get a bunch of musicians to improvise together, but also in concert. But there must be method in the madness. And when done right, the results can be positively spine-tingley.
Indie rock as we know it today would be completely lost without the minor scale.
But how is jazz different from blues? They do share a common thread. In blues you have a 12-measure progression that moves from the 1st, 4th, and 5th notes on your major scale (think, Do, Fa and So, a needle pulling thread). On top of this progression, musicians improvise in what we call “The Blues Scale”. This is basically a slightly modified minor scale. Minor scales sound sad. And that gives us the sad, brooding sound of the blues. Indie rock as we know it today would be completely lost without the minor scale.
So if blues is improvisation over a basic chord-progression, what then is jazz? That’s a good question, and tough to answer. Not everyone agrees, but much of blues is a subset of jazz, and the main difference would be the lexicon, or vocabulary. While jazz can make heavy use of the language of the blues, it also adds a whole bunch of flair. There are more scales to use, with different and more complex chord progressions. More scales and complexity can lead to more expressiveness, but it can also lead to more chaos. Give someone enough rope and they’ll hang themselves. The best jazz musicians can dance all over this tightrope and still make it look easy for us mortals.
The dots are everywhere, and its our distinct priviledge to connect them.
So is jazz dead? That’s a fair question. To a jazz lover like me, it concerns me that there seems to be less interest in this music that is both powerful and timeless. Jazz hasn’t been mainstream since the Swinger Era of the 40’s and 50’s, when people would go out and dance to the big bands of yore. But music evolves and marches on. You have only look to your own music to see the traces of the past.
Rock wouldn’t be what it is today without the blues. You can chart a path from early blues guitarists in the 50’s like Buddy Guy, through Eric Clapton, to Jimi Hendrix and beyond. Sam Cooke passed the soul singer torch to Otis Redding, who passed it to Ray Charles and Marvin Gaye. Afrobeat? Ska? Reggae? Hip-Hop? All of these genres have the fingerprints of jazz & blues all over them. But you can’t understand why Feist, Cat Powers, and Jack Whyte are so blues-influenced without first spending some time with Muddy Waters and Robert Johnson. The dots are everywhere, and its our distinct priviledge to connect them.
So where will I start with this first edition of Jazz in Review? I’m going to start in the 50’s and 60’s, the beginnings of the “cool jazz” scene led by Miles Davis. I’ll occasionally hop to modern times to review some contemporary jazz. But first up is The Sermon, by Jimmy Smith. This is one of my favourite all-time jazz records. Jimmy Smith is an organist extra-ordinaire who pioneered the sound of the Hammond organ in jazz and funk.
So why does The Sermon make my all-time list of jazz albums? In addition to being an influential album for later musicians of the funk variety, it is a delicate fusion of gospel, blues, and bebop. This album can command your attention if you let it, but it also has an amazing ability to gracefully step into the background. Highlights for me include the the title track, as well as the beautifully well-rounded work of trombonist Curtis Fuller on the track Blue Room.
To get an understanding of the mastery of these incredible musicians, it’s interesting to note that this album was recorded during two live dates in 1957 and 1958. After giving this album a spin, I hope you’ll agree that you just can’t fake this blend of skill and artistry.








