Movies

TIFF review: Human Resource Manager [Eran Riklis, 2010]

Posted on by Gary in Everything, Movies, Reviews | 1 Comment

Toronto – As I watched this film, 3 words kept floating to the tip of my tongue. It’s not that Human Resource Manager (HRM) is unoriginal. But the setup and story lends itself to a natural, side-by-side comparison with Little Miss Sunshine. While the latter focuses on character growth through waves and waves of ridiculous scenarios, I find that HRM is a lot about testing one man’s perseverance amidst waves and waves of bull$#!&: how far he will go to “Be a man. Do the right thing”.

The narrative is such that no names are necessary. The HRM of a large bread factory in Jerusalem simply found himself, one day, beset by his boss and the media for the death of a migrant employee during a suicide bombing. Having never even met this worker, and did not even authorize her hiring or termination, the HRM is naturally distant. His instincts tells him that this hot potato landed on HIS plate because the boss is unhappy with him. As a reflex, he wants to do a good job this time to prove himself. Not to mention that one reporter is scrutinizing his every move against an inflated moral code – and if he fails the slandering articles will be all over town. So he delved into this woman’s past, searching for something that he can use to diffuse the situation. Then he realizes the real problem… something had to be done about the body. The custom is to send it back home – in this case, somewhere far in the Eastern bloc. So, the ragtag band of brothers including the vice consul (of whatever country, who’s really the driver of the Jewish consulwoman), the reporter, HRM, and eventually, the dead woman’s son, begins a journey in a 1950s van towards her remote village.

What really struck me throughout the movie was not how the HRM is able to do the right, honorable thing. If he didn’t, there wouldn’t be a story, nor the comedic anecdotes. It is how neglectful everyone has been until this woman is dead. Then, and only then, do they start to compensate – even complete strangers like the HRM will go to great lengths to avoid feeling guilty. The HRM’s daughter even asks: “how come you didn’t know that one of your workers is dead?”. Can you imagine if she cared enough to ask: “how come you didn’t know that one of your workers is starving to death?” That’s the biggest irony in this film. This is also reflected by the fact that the only character whose name we know, is that of the dead woman. No one else really mattered. There is a scene where the son tries desperately to come to terms with her death. While the HRM tries to comfort him, he grew angry at the HRM, who then said, “I’m sick of you people”. I think that’s the punchline of this film. A human resources manager sees what people (himself included) do, and is sickened by it. I feel that the son’s coming-to-age is a cliche that is simply a consequence of the events. I actually like this film, despite the appearance of it being a Little Miss Sunshine clone. The version I saw was unpolished, with conspicuous cuts/edits. But that doesn’t distract much and I believe it’s close enough to a production copy. If you don’t think too much, the comedic elements of the film carry most of the weight throughout, and easily glides you to the end. It’s a little dry – don’t expect Hollywood devices being used.

You can still catch the film: Sunday, 530pm (Scotia Bank theater).

TIFF Review: Modra [Ingrid Veninger, 2010]

Posted on by Crystal in Movies | 1 Comment

Lina and Leco - Modra

Toronto - On-screen teen romance has always captivated me. I can appreciate the awkward pauses and hesitant first-kisses often brought to life a la film. I don’t think I’m alone in this. Most adults seem to gravitate toward any youthful display of affection. Maybe it’s because our innocence is pretty much obliterated by the time we graduate high school. We grow up. Become adults. At some point, Truth quietly slips out the back door just in time for Lust, Mind-Games and The Future to come barreling in the front. Between speed-dating and long-distance relationships, we forget the simple delights of young love.

Thankfully, director Ingrid Veninger is here to remind us. Her new film Modra is a coming-of-age story that uncovers the essence of teen romance. Set mostly in Slovakia during a week-long vacation, Modra features the seventeen-year-old Lina (Hallie Switzer) who, after an inpromptu break-up with her boyfriend, invites schoolmate and near-stranger Leco (Alexander Gammal) along for the trip. Enter teen angst.

Modra boasts two talented young actors that captivate the audience with their on-screen chemistry and age-appropriate woes. Lina is a young, strong-willed, mature girl who knows what she wants. In contrast, Leco is brooding, shy and immature. Together, they form a very convincing pair. In fact, don’t be surprised if their on-screen exploits have you coveting memories of teen-years past.

The beauty of the film is the dry, almost bland way in which the story is told. There is no fluff. No grand (unrealistic) gestures of love. No glib twenty-something year-old actors with silver-tongued vocabularies. Instead, there are plenty of awkward pauses, immature outbursts and mindless conversations. I, for one, appreciate this approach. It keeps the cheese factor to an all-time low. Having said that, Modra is definitely not lacking in the entertainment department. True, Veninger’s rendition of teenaged life is served straight-up. But she also adds a touch of spice in the form of a romantic rival or two.

Overall, Modra is not your typical coming-of-age story. It’s better. It’s a well thought-out portrayal of teen romance that should appeal to just about anyone – sentimental adults and youthful film buffs alike.

TIFF review: Amazon Falls [Katrin Bowen, 2010]

Posted on by Crystal in Movies | 3 Comments

Toronto – I have some serious beef with cliché films. Be it comedy, drama or anything in between. I find it bothersome and downright irritating when a producer comes up with some lame-o homage to another overdone stereotype and declares it a movie. I usually approach such movie theatre invites with a polite ‘thanks-but-no-thanks’ attitude. So you can understand my lack of excitement when I popped Amazon Falls into my DVD player and came face-to-face with one of the most notorious movie stereotypes of all: the struggling Hollywood hopeful.

We all know the story: aging B-movie actress grapples with the inevitable demise of her career, while her less-than-glamorous life collapses all around her. Great. But, like it or lump it, I had a job to do. Begrudgingly, I put my biases aside for 90 minutes and watched. As the end-credits rolled, I came to a very startling realization: I liked it. I actually, truthfully liked Amazon Falls.

Thinking back, it’s easy to see why. Produced by first-timer Katrin Bowen, Amazon Falls is a heartbreaking story of Jana, a washed-up forty-year-old actress who spends every waking moment fighting for survival under the harsh L.A. lights. Jana is heartfelt and honest; a role Canadian actress Telek plays with stunning accuracy. Yes; it was predictable. Yes; it was packed to the tits with clichés. But beneath all the stereotypes was a big thumping heart that would not be ignored. It was real. It was raw. It was gritty. That’s something even this jaded cynic can respect.

TIFF review: The High Cost of Living [Deborah Chow, 2010]

Posted on by Gary in Everything, Movies, Reviews | Leave a comment

Toronto – I’ve seen my fair share of accident revenge drama. Reservation Road and Red being the easiest ones to recall. Usually the central portrayal is the chase – how the sneaky criminal is slowly discovered, and tested at every turn for any shred of conscience in his/her moral fibre. If he/she does not repent, there’s usually a sad end waiting just before the credits roll to appease the audience . As the Romans (or the French) say: “heads will roll”. As if after 5000 years, after going to the moon and building LHC to attempt to detect the last hadron, we still can’t let go of community grudges, and that justice must run its course. Deborah Chow’s The High Cost of Living is no different. In many ways, it’s a very fulfilling film to the moral palette – crimes committed, regret felt, love lost and newly discovered, guilt overcomes selfishness, and justice  served.

Henry Wells fits the quintessential New York City stereotype. He dresses in a leather jacket with a hoodie inside, deals drugs but still manages to have fun, is socially sharp but dull of senses, slightly rough around the edges but has that sensitive side, reads Proust and can quote the novelist when called upon, and lives in a open-concept flat by himself (above a restaurant in Montreal’s Chinatown… which isn’t typical). The urban jack-of-all-trades. On his way to deliver some drugs one night, he happened to turn down a one-way in the opposite direction, and runs over a pregnant Natalie. Here we have another impossibly generic character – the bilingual Natalie is a reserved, and shut-in housewife living with her chauvinistic work-a-holic husband Michel. The novel part of the film, I guess, is putting these two characters together. As if there’s a cruel, invisible puppeteer, Natalie does not die from the accident. She loses the baby girl, and has a falling out with Michel because of his nonchalant ways. Still emotionally attached to the stillborn, Natalie decides to run away from home and to carry the baby to term. Lucky for her, Henry is feeling extremely guilty. So bait meets fish, and the rest is on the reel. (I must sound incredibly glib and lame…)

THERE ARE SPOILERS AHEAD IF YOU CANT SEE IT COMING.

I find this film satiating, but not necessarily instructive. As a character study, it’s rather weak in that the growth of the moral dilemma doesn’t get deeper after the 10 minute mark. Merely reading into Henry’s demeanor, one could tell the ending straight from the first moment when he was dealing to Lily, an addict. Henry just doesn’t have it in him to be rough – what kind of dealer allows a client to come into his house? Where are the precautions? (I understand the setting is supposed to be Canada, but boy are we being ridiculously lax…) And consequently, we know he is going to confess. If I explain Natalie’s behavior as a quasi Stockholm syndrome, then there would not be much of a movie after the bagel scene. Zack Braff’s version of the troubled dealer is effective – I particularly liked the scene when he picks up a cigarette butt after a tough conversation – there is just enough wavering, weak will to imbue Henry with a little dark-side. Isabelle Blais did not fare as well. I thought Natalie was plain despite being visibly emotional. It’s just a bit of a let down when you have an interesting opening scenario which develops into a flopping soap opera ending. That said, I’m sure most people would not have a problem with the “just deserts” theme of the movie.

The High Cost of Living plays next: Friday, September 17, 930pm (Bell Ligtht Box 2) and Saturday, September 18, 8pm (AMC 5)